A gantry crane has no building to hold it up, and that changes the energy bill completely. Here is where the power goes on a 5 to 100 tonne machine, why long travel beats the hoist on a tyred crane, and the two upgrades that pay back before you buy any hardware.
A gantry crane from 5 to 100 tonnes costs somewhere between USD 2,500 and USD 60,000 a year to power. On most yard machines the biggest single item is not the hoist. It is the gantry travel drive dragging a 40 to 400 tonne portal frame up and down the rail. This 2026 guide breaks the gantry crane power draw down by motion, compares diesel RTG with cable reel and busbar electrification, and shows which upgrades actually pay back.
On an overhead crane the hoist takes most of the energy. Our own breakdown of a double girder machine put the hoist share at 65 to 80%. A gantry crane behaves differently, and the difference is not subtle.
The Energies 2024 paper “Analysis of Energy Consumption of Container Cranes” (Energies 2024, 17(5), 985) measured a berth crane at roughly 62% hoist, 31% gantry and 7% trolley. Run the same paper's model on a land-side container yard and the split flips hard: about 85% gantry, 9% hoist, 4% trolley and 2% for handling. That paper also clocked one class of machine at 69.8 kWh per hour at a marine terminal and 17.23 kWh per hour at an inland yard. Same equipment, four times the draw.
So the first question to ask about any gantry crane is not "how big is the hoist". It is "how far does the load travel along the ground". A crane that picks up and sets down in the same bay still lives on its hoist. A crane that runs a 200 m yard lives on its long travel motors.
| Gantry type | Hoist | Trolley | Gantry travel | What drives the number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berth / quay gantry | 55 - 65% | 5 - 10% | 25 - 35% | Short travel along the quay, tall lifts |
| Rail mounted yard gantry (RMG) | 35 - 50% | 10 - 15% | 35 - 55% | Long yard travel on low friction rails |
| Rubber tyred gantry (RTG) | 20 - 35% | 5 - 12% | 50 - 70% | High rolling resistance on tyres |
| Outdoor double girder gantry | 55 - 75% | 8 - 15% | 10 - 25% | Wide span, load moves in the trolley not the rail |
Shares are SIEC planning figures built on the motion split published in Energies 2024, 17(5), 985 and on our own commissioning records. They are a planning aid, not a published statistic.
Friction. That is the whole story, and it is easy to put numbers on.
A steel wheel on a steel rail rolls with a resistance coefficient of roughly 0.002 to 0.005. A rubber tyre on a paved yard rolls at 0.010 to 0.020, and on soft or poorly compacted ground it climbs to 0.03. That is a four to ten times difference in the force the motor has to pull against. Nothing else about the crane changes.
Now put it on a real machine. A 32 tonne RTG with the spreader and a loaded container weighs around 200 tonnes in service, and it travels at about 100 m/min, which is 1.67 m/s.
Five times the steady power, for the same load and the same speed. And steady power is not the worst case. Accelerating that 200 tonnes to full speed in 6 seconds needs another 55 kN, or roughly 93 kW on top. That peak, not the rolling figure, is what sizes the drive and the genset.
| Wheel and surface | Resistance | Force at 200 t | Steady power at 100 m/min |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steel wheel on steel rail | 0.002 - 0.005 | 3.9 - 9.8 kN | 6.5 - 16.4 kW |
| Rubber tyre on concrete | 0.010 - 0.020 | 19.6 - 39.2 kN | 32.7 - 65.4 kW |
| Rubber tyre on compacted gravel | 0.025 - 0.035 | 49.1 - 68.7 kN | 81.9 - 114.5 kW |
This is the single reason an RTG needs a 300 to 450 kW diesel genset while an RMG of the same duty runs happily off a modest cable reel. The tyre, not the container, is paying for the power plant.
Here is the motor inventory we quote against. Numbers are SIEC planning figures at 400 V / 50 Hz with VFD drives and A5 to A7 duty.
| Capacity | Hoist | Trolley | Gantry travel | Installed total | Typical span |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 t | 7.5 kW | 1.5 kW | 2 × 1.5 kW | 13 kW | 12 - 18 m |
| 10 t | 13 kW | 2.2 kW | 2 × 2.2 kW | 20 kW | 15 - 22 m |
| 20 t | 22 kW | 3.7 kW | 2 × 3.7 kW | 33 kW | 18 - 26 m |
| 32 t (RTG, 1 over 5) | 45 kW | 15 kW | 4 × 22 kW | 150 kW | 23 - 26 m |
| 40 t (RMG) | 55 kW | 22 kW | 4 × 15 kW | 142 kW | 30 - 40 m |
| 65 t (RMG) | 90 kW | 30 kW | 4 × 22 kW | 208 kW | 40 - 50 m |
| 100 t heavy gantry | 132 kW | 45 kW | 4 × 30 kW | 297 kW | 30 - 40 m |
Two things worth noticing. First, the gantry travel motors on the two yard machines together draw as much as the hoist. Second, none of these figures sizes your genset. Peak demand during a simultaneous hoist and travel, plus wind, is what does that. Every one of these gantry crane configurations is quoted with its own motor schedule.
Four steps. Install power times a demand factor, divided by drive efficiency, times the tariff. That is it.
The demand factor is the honest part and the one most quotes get wrong. It is the average load over running time as a fraction of installed power:
| Duty class | Demand factor | Drive efficiency | Fuel path efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| A5 medium | 0.35 | 0.85 (VFD) | 0.33 diesel genset |
| A6 heavy | 0.45 | 0.85 (VFD) | 0.30 diesel mechanical |
| A7 very heavy | 0.55 | 0.78 slip ring | — |
| A8 continuous | 0.65 | 0.85 (VFD) | — |
Worked example, 32 t RTG on A6, 150 kW installed, grid power at USD 0.12 a kWh:
150 × 0.45 ÷ 0.85 = 79.4 kW of electrical input. Times USD 0.12, that is USD 9.53 per running hour. Now run the same crane on its own diesel genset at 33% conversion: 79.4 ÷ 0.33 = 240.6 kW of fuel energy, which at 9.97 kWh per litre of diesel is 24.1 litres an hour. At USD 0.85 a litre that is USD 20.50 per running hour.
Same crane, same work, twice the money. That gap is the entire reason electrification keeps coming up in terminal meetings.
Published figures for a 40 t class RTG with a 350 to 450 kW genset cluster around 1.4 to 2.2 litres per container move, or roughly 20 to 35 litres per running hour. An RTG working a 3,000 hour year at 20 moves an hour lands near 60,000 moves, which is 84,000 to 132,000 litres of diesel a year. At USD 0.85 a litre that is USD 71,000 to USD 112,000 per crane per year.
Put that next to the crane price. A 40 t class RTG sells for roughly USD 900,000 to 1,600,000. Fuel is 5 to 12% of the purchase price, every year, for the whole service life. It is the largest operating cost on the machine and it is the one most terminals under-budget.
| Item | Diesel RTG | Electrified RTG (cable reel or busbar) | Hybrid RTG (battery or supercapacitor) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onboard power | 350 - 450 kW genset | None, 380 - 480 V supply | 150 - 200 kW genset plus storage |
| Energy per move | 1.4 - 2.2 L diesel | 4.5 - 7.0 kWh | 0.7 - 1.2 L plus regen |
| Cost per move | USD 1.19 - 1.87 | USD 0.54 - 0.84 | USD 0.60 - 1.02 |
| Annual energy cost, 60,000 moves | USD 71,000 - 112,000 | USD 32,000 - 50,000 | USD 36,000 - 61,000 |
| Yard emissions and noise | NOx, PM, diesel noise | None at the crane | Much reduced |
Diesel at USD 0.85 a litre and grid power at USD 0.12 a kWh is a two to one ratio in favour of electricity. Where industrial power is cheaper, or diesel dearer, the gap widens further. In markets where diesel is subsidised, it can close. Check your own two numbers before you accept anyone's payback claim.
Usually yes, but the honest answer is that it depends on how many hours you run. Electrification is a capital purchase that buys a cheaper litre, so the more litres you would have burned, the faster it pays.
| Option | Capital premium per crane | Annual saving, 3,000 h year | Simple payback |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genset auto start / stop and eco mode | USD 3,000 - 8,000 | USD 12,000 - 30,000 | 3 - 8 months |
| Regeneration on hoist and trolley | USD 14,000 - 40,000 | USD 8,000 - 18,000 | 1 - 4 years |
| Hybrid retrofit, battery on existing genset | USD 150,000 - 350,000 | USD 30,000 - 55,000 | 3 - 9 years |
| Full electrification, cable reel plus trench | USD 250,000 - 550,000 | USD 40,000 - 65,000 | 5 - 11 years |
| Full electrification, conductor bar | USD 300,000 - 600,000 | USD 40,000 - 65,000 | 6 - 12 years |
Capital premiums and savings above are SIEC planning figures for a 40 t class yard crane, not vendor quotations. Run them against your own fuel and power prices, because a payback that looks strong at USD 0.85 diesel looks weak at USD 0.50.
The row most people skip is the first one. An RTG genset idles for 30 to 50% of its shift, burning fuel with nothing moving. Auto start and stop costs a few thousand dollars and usually beats every hardware upgrade on this page. If you do one thing after reading this, do that.
It changes almost everything about the energy bill, which is why RTG against RMG is an energy decision as much as a civil works decision. The RMG wins on every energy line. The RTG wins because it does not need rails.
| Item | RMG, steel wheel on rail | RTG, rubber tyre |
|---|---|---|
| Long travel resistance | 0.002 - 0.005 | 0.010 - 0.020 |
| Travel power, 200 t at 100 m/min | 6.5 - 16.4 kW | 32.7 - 65.4 kW |
| Energy per 40 t container move | 2.5 - 4.0 kWh | 4.5 - 7.0 kWh |
| Power source | Cable reel or conductor bar, from the grid | Diesel genset, or hybrid with storage |
| Regeneration destination | Back into the terminal network | Only into a battery or supercapacitor |
| Civil works | Rails, foundation, drainage | Paved runway and compaction |
The counterweight is that RMG civil works are expensive and permanent, while an RTG can be moved to another yard. Terminals that expect their layout to change buy RTGs and pay the fuel bill. Terminals that know their layout buy RMGs, lay rail once and take the cheaper energy for twenty years. Both are rational. Mixing the two by accident is not.
On an outdoor crane, more than most people expect. Wind force is 0.5 times air density times wind speed squared times a drag coefficient times the exposed area.
Take a 32 t gantry with 120 m² of exposed area and a drag coefficient of 1.3, travelling at 100 m/min:
| Wind speed | Wind force | Extra travel power | Compared with tyre resistance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 m/s | 9.6 kN | 16.0 kW | About half |
| 15 m/s | 21.5 kN | 35.9 kW | About the same |
| 20 m/s | 38.2 kN | 63.8 kW | Nearly double |
| 25 m/s, non working | 59.7 kN | Anchored, clamps take it | Not a motor duty |
Now the consequence people miss. A travel drive sized on the calm-day rolling resistance is undersized for the windy day, and it will trip out on overload exactly when the yard is busiest. That is why a 45 kW travel motor shows up where 22 kW would do the arithmetic on a still day. It is not padding. It is the wind case.
A tailwind is the other edge of the same blade. Pushed along by the wind, the drive regenerates instead of consuming, and on an RMG that energy goes back into the terminal network. You cannot bank on it, but it is real, and it is another reason a grid connected gantry beats a diesel one.
Yes, and by a wide margin. Here is the same 32 t electrified yard crane at four duty classes with a 5.6 kWh per move figure, over a 3,000 hour year.
| Duty class | Moves per hour | Moves per year | Annual kWh | Annual cost | Ten year cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A5 medium | 10 | 30,000 | 168,000 | USD 20,160 | USD 231,000 |
| A6 heavy | 20 | 60,000 | 336,000 | USD 40,320 | USD 462,000 |
| A7 very heavy | 30 | 90,000 | 504,000 | USD 60,480 | USD 693,000 |
| A8 continuous | 40 | 120,000 | 672,000 | USD 80,640 | USD 924,000 |
Ten year figures apply a 3% annual power price escalation, a factor of 11.46.
Four times the energy on the same crane, purely from how hard you work it. Anyone comparing two gantry crane quotes has to compare the duty classes first. A cheap A5 machine asked to do A7 work will not last, and will not save you anything.
EU Regulation 2019/1781 sets the floor. From 1 July 2021, three phase motors from 0.75 to 1,000 kW had to reach IE3, and smaller ones from 0.12 to 0.75 kW reached IE2. From 1 July 2023, non-brake, non-Ex motors from 75 to 200 kW had to reach IE4.
Read the exemption carefully, because it matters on a gantry crane. Annex I point 2(c) excludes motors with an integrated brake that cannot be removed or separately powered for testing. Nearly every gantry travel and trolley motor is a brake motor, so the IE4 tier does not catch them. The IE3 baseline still does.
| Rating, 4 pole | IE3 efficiency | IE4 efficiency | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.5 kW | 89.6% | 91.4% | 1.8 points |
| 11 kW | 91.4% | 93.3% | 1.9 points |
| 22 kW | 93.0% | 94.5% | 1.5 points |
| 55 kW | 94.6% | 95.4% | 0.8 points |
| 90 kW | 95.2% | 95.8% | 0.6 points |
On a jib crane this table is a rounding error. On a gantry crane it is not, because there are four or more travel motors and they run for thousands of hours. Take a 22 kW travel motor at 45% load over 3,000 hours. One efficiency point is 0.79 kW, or 2,380 kWh a year. Two points across four motors is roughly 19,000 kWh a year, about USD 2,300 at USD 0.12. That is worth asking your supplier about.
North American terminals run 480 V at 60 Hz. Europe and most of Asia run 400 V at 50 Hz. Both work. They do not mix.
| Item | NEMA practice | IEC practice |
|---|---|---|
| Voltage tolerance | Plus or minus 10% | Zone A plus or minus 5%, zone B plus or minus 10% |
| Frequency tolerance | Plus or minus 5% | Zone A plus 2%, zone B plus 3% minus 5% |
| Overload allowance | Service factor 1.15 | No service factor, use duty types S1 to S10 |
| Gantry duty type | Continuous rating with service factor | S4 or S5, intermittent with electric braking or starting |
| Speed at 4 pole | About 1,750 rpm at 60 Hz | About 1,450 rpm at 50 Hz |
That last row is the practical trap. Move a 60 Hz gantry to a 50 Hz grid and the motors turn about 20% slower unless you change the gearbox or re-rate the drive. Every speed in the datasheet shifts with it. Cable reels and conductor bars are voltage specific too, so a crane relocated across markets usually needs its supply system rebuilt rather than adapted.
Most terminals are billed on kVA as well as kWh, and a poor power factor makes the kVA number climb.
| Power factor | kVA drawn for 135.9 kW | Extra kVA against 0.95 | Extra demand charge, USD 12 per kVA month |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.95 | 143 | 0 | USD 0 |
| 0.90 | 151 | 8 | USD 1,152 a year |
| 0.85 | 160 | 17 | USD 2,448 a year |
| 0.80 | 170 | 27 | USD 3,888 a year |
| 0.70 | 194 | 51 | USD 7,344 a year |
Published utility case studies put power factor correction at a mid four figure capital cost with payback under a year when penalties are already being charged. An active front end on the large drives does the same job harder: power factor near 0.99 and total harmonic distortion below 5%, plus 15 to 20% off the drive energy on drives above about 50 kW. Slip ring motors converted to VFD get all of this at once.
Lowering is the only motion that hands energy back, and a gantry crane does a lot of lowering.
A 40 t container lowered 15 m releases 40,000 × 9.81 × 15 = 5.886 MJ, which is 1.63 kWh. At 70% recovery that is 1.14 kWh per lowering move. Over 60,000 moves that is 68,400 kWh a year.
Now the part that surprises people. On a grid connected crane that 68,400 kWh is worth about USD 8,200 at USD 0.12. On a diesel RTG, where every electrical kWh costs roughly USD 0.258 to make from fuel at USD 0.85 a litre through a 33% efficient genset, the same 68,400 kWh is worth about USD 17,600.
Regeneration is worth more than twice as much on a diesel machine as on an electric one. That is counter-intuitive until you remember that on the diesel crane you are not buying cheap grid power, you are refusing to burn diesel.
Practical limit: a diesel RTG with no battery has nowhere to put the recovered energy, so it burns it in a brake resistor. That is exactly why the hybrid retrofit exists. On an RMG with a regenerative drive, the energy simply flows back through the conductor bar into the terminal network.
Ranked by return, not by how interesting the engineering is.
| Order | Action | Capital | Annual effect | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stop the genset idling, add auto start and stop | USD 3,000 - 8,000 | USD 12,000 - 30,000 saved | Under a year |
| 2 | Tyre pressure discipline and steering mode rules | None | 5 to 12% off travel energy | Immediate |
| 3 | Regenerative drive on hoist and trolley | USD 14,000 - 40,000 | USD 8,000 - 18,000 saved | 1 - 4 years |
| 4 | Power factor correction or active front end | USD 12,000 - 30,000 | USD 3,000 - 7,000 saved | 2 - 5 years |
| 5 | Hybrid battery retrofit | USD 150,000 - 350,000 | USD 30,000 - 55,000 saved | 3 - 9 years |
| 6 | Full electrification | USD 250,000 - 600,000 | USD 40,000 - 65,000 saved | 5 - 12 years |
| 7 | IE4 motors on non-brake drives only | Motor price step | About USD 2,300 on four 22 kW motors | Rarely on efficiency alone |
Note what sits at number one and number two. The two best returns on a gantry crane cost almost nothing and are not products. They are a control change and a maintenance habit. The expensive hardware is at five and six, and it earns its place only when the crane genuinely runs thousands of hours a year. If your gantry crane works 800 hours a year, skip everything below row three and go home.
If you cannot measure it, you cannot claim it, and you cannot tell whether the upgrade worked.
Normalise everything to kWh per move. That is the one figure that stays comparable when volumes change, and it is the only number a terminal manager can use to compare two cranes or two years. For our own machines we log the same set and hand it over at commissioning, and every rail mounted and rubber tyred gantry crane we build is quoted with the metering you ask for.
An electrified 32 t yard gantry on heavy duty uses roughly 336,000 kWh a year, about USD 40,000 at USD 0.12 a kWh. A small 5 t outdoor gantry on medium duty uses closer to 20,600 kWh, about USD 2,500. The spread between those two machines comes more from duty class and travel length than from lifting capacity.
Rolling resistance. A rubber tyre on concrete rolls at 0.010 to 0.020, while a steel wheel on steel rail rolls at 0.002 to 0.005. For the same 200 t service weight at 100 m/min that is 33 to 65 kW on tyres against 6.5 to 16 kW on rails. The RTG also carries its own diesel genset, which adds a conversion loss of two thirds before the energy even reaches a motor.
Usually, if the crane runs more than about 2,000 hours a year. Full electrification costs USD 250,000 to 600,000 per crane and saves USD 40,000 to 65,000 a year in energy, which pays back in five to twelve years. Before that, spend USD 3,000 to 8,000 on genset auto start and stop, which typically saves USD 12,000 to 30,000 a year by itself.
On a yard gantry crane, long travel. The Energies 2024, 17(5), 985 study puts a land side container yard machine at about 85% gantry, 9% hoist and 4% trolley. On a berth crane or an indoor gantry crane the hoist usually leads instead. The deciding factor is how far the load travels along the ground.
For an electrified rail mounted gantry, 2.5 to 4.0 kWh per 40 t container move. For a rubber tyred gantry, 4.5 to 7.0 kWh. If your numbers are far below that, check the meter is capturing regeneration. If they are far above, look at tyre pressure, steering mode and how much of the shift the machine spends idling.
A 32 t electrified yard crane on heavy duty costs about USD 9.50 per running hour in electricity at USD 0.12 a kWh. The same crane on its own diesel genset costs about USD 20.50 per running hour at USD 0.85 a litre. That roughly two to one gap is the whole case for electrification in one line.
Related articles:
Gantry Crane Cost and Total Cost of Ownership Guide 2026: Price, Installation and Ten-Year TCO
Gantry Crane Installation Guide 2026: Rails, Foundation, Wheel Loads and Load Testing
Gantry Crane for Precast Concrete Yards: Configuration, Capacity and Layout
Crane Energy Consumption: What a Double Girder Crane Really Costs to Run
Gantry Crane Guide: Types, Capacity, Span and Selection